There is zero harm in doing so.Īpt provides a high-level commandline interface for the package management system. It is what Discover/Gnome Software/packagekit use under the hood, and is how Ubuntu was set up to use.
#SUDO APT GET UPDATE AND UPGRADE INSTALL#
Most of the time, running the latter in Ubuntu is just fine, but there will be times when this won't install all the updates, just like the old apt-get upgrade would not, but not to the extreme.įor people who use PPAs, and particularly Kubuntu users who use their Backports and/or Updates PPAs, if you don't use full-upgrade you won't get all the new deps, and many packages won't be installed, and thus creating conflicts and breakages. Ubuntu uses apt full-upgrade over simply apt upgrade. Now, with the move to plain 'apt', there still is a difference. just as the command would seem to indicate. apt-get dist-upgradewas the correct way to install updates in Ubuntu, while on Debian, it was part of the methods used to upgrade that distro to a newer release. Using apt-get upgrade in Ubuntu would not install all the available updates and their new dependencies, whereas in Debian this was the correct usage, as there would not be new dependencies, by design. This was more prominent back when apt-get was the norm. The confusions come from the differences between how Debian and Ubuntu updates happen. Now, in recent years, the command has changed, from the old apt-get to just apt You need to use both, as they do different things.Īpt full-upgrade install the updates found from apt update.
0 kommentar(er)
